Thursday, June 3, 2010
saurabh ke kitchen se.......
Soch ko badlo, sitare badal jayenge..........Najar ko badlo, nazare badal jayenge...........Kashtiya badalne ki jarurat nahi................Dishaon ko badlo, KINARE badal jayenge..............
take this.........
Taalim nahi di jaati parindo ko udaano ki........woh to khud hi samajh jaate hain ucchai aasmano ki......
Define Saurabh
Mein Samandar hoon kahin doob na jaana mujh mein, tujhe andaza nahi hai meri gehraai ka...
saurabh ki jubani
aankhon mein manzilein thi.........gire aur sambhalte rahe..........aandhiyon mein kya dum tha..........chiraag hawa mein bhi jalte rahe.........
tongue twister
Hard To Tell:
A duel was fought between Alexander Shott and John Nott. Nott was shot and Shott was not. In this case it was better to be Shott than Nott. Some said that Nott was not shot. But Shott says that he shot Nott.It may be that the shot Shott shot, shot Nott, or it may be possible that the shot Shott shot, shot Shott himself. We think, however, that the shot Shott shot, shot not Shott, but Nott.Anyway it is hard to tell which was shot and which was not.
google_protectAndRun("render_ads.js::google_render_ad", google_handleError, google_render_ad);
A duel was fought between Alexander Shott and John Nott. Nott was shot and Shott was not. In this case it was better to be Shott than Nott. Some said that Nott was not shot. But Shott says that he shot Nott.It may be that the shot Shott shot, shot Nott, or it may be possible that the shot Shott shot, shot Shott himself. We think, however, that the shot Shott shot, shot not Shott, but Nott.Anyway it is hard to tell which was shot and which was not.
google_protectAndRun("render_ads.js::google_render_ad", google_handleError, google_render_ad);
JUSTICE SOMETIMES TAKES TIME
Legal Story of The DayJustice Delayed is Justice Denied
She fought 25 years for Rs 84 for her bonus, will get Rs 2KIt took a woman over a quarter of a century to finally get a sum of Rs 84 as part of bonus from her employer. In 1984, Padmawati was informed that a bonus of Rs 84 — promised to her by her employer M/s Superbazaar co-operative store — will not be given. Sixty-six other labourers also learned that they will get no bonus. ``I worked in Superbazaar during 1983-1984 as a packer on piece-rate basis. The management declared a bonus for the duration we worked. However, when we asked for it the company refused,'' recalled Padmawati, who is now 50 years old. All 67 employees then filed a case against the store through their counsel, Ashok Aggarwal. Even as the hearing began in 1984, it took 15 years for the court to settle the case. While in December 1999, the labour court in Tis Hazari decided in favour of the labourers and directed the store to pay them within three months, the ordeal did not end there. The store moved Delhi high court in 2000 challenging the trial court's order and managed to get a stay. Twenty-five years later — on May, 2010 — the petitioners finally got justice with the cooperative store agreeing before the HC to pay them their due on pro rata basis. ``The respondent's workmen are directed to appear before the registrar general of this court, along with documents in support of their identity, to get the payment,'' the court said, expressing concern over the fact that the payments were delayed "by over 10 years". Padmawati will get over Rs 2000, including interest. But she is the least satisfied. ``I never knew it would take a lifetime before we get our money. I had given up hope. I will get a lot more than Rs 84, but the battle was still not worth giving 25 years,'' she said. Ashok Aggarwal said, ``It took a long time but any order in favour of the workers is a landmark judgment.'' Source:- The Times of India 24 May 2010 Delhi 7RegardsDeepak Miglani Advocate Delhi High Court
She fought 25 years for Rs 84 for her bonus, will get Rs 2KIt took a woman over a quarter of a century to finally get a sum of Rs 84 as part of bonus from her employer. In 1984, Padmawati was informed that a bonus of Rs 84 — promised to her by her employer M/s Superbazaar co-operative store — will not be given. Sixty-six other labourers also learned that they will get no bonus. ``I worked in Superbazaar during 1983-1984 as a packer on piece-rate basis. The management declared a bonus for the duration we worked. However, when we asked for it the company refused,'' recalled Padmawati, who is now 50 years old. All 67 employees then filed a case against the store through their counsel, Ashok Aggarwal. Even as the hearing began in 1984, it took 15 years for the court to settle the case. While in December 1999, the labour court in Tis Hazari decided in favour of the labourers and directed the store to pay them within three months, the ordeal did not end there. The store moved Delhi high court in 2000 challenging the trial court's order and managed to get a stay. Twenty-five years later — on May, 2010 — the petitioners finally got justice with the cooperative store agreeing before the HC to pay them their due on pro rata basis. ``The respondent's workmen are directed to appear before the registrar general of this court, along with documents in support of their identity, to get the payment,'' the court said, expressing concern over the fact that the payments were delayed "by over 10 years". Padmawati will get over Rs 2000, including interest. But she is the least satisfied. ``I never knew it would take a lifetime before we get our money. I had given up hope. I will get a lot more than Rs 84, but the battle was still not worth giving 25 years,'' she said. Ashok Aggarwal said, ``It took a long time but any order in favour of the workers is a landmark judgment.'' Source:- The Times of India 24 May 2010 Delhi 7RegardsDeepak Miglani Advocate Delhi High Court
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)